"I was refering (sic) to the devine (sic) piece in another thread here and a “bright” fellow who has written a critique of it is almost incomprehensible ,unlike the devine (sic) article which is well argued and clear . This fellow claims environmental science as his area of expertese (sic) . if (sic) he is an example of the science people we are producing in Australia we are in big trouble." - Iain Hall, 5th of March 2006.
"Will folks please leave comments for Bruce ?
he has enabled comment moderation on his blog but as far as I can tell he does not get much feedback and maybe he needs some ..." - Iain Hall, 5th of March 2006, only just two and a half hours after the previous post.
Editor's Note: He is directly appealing to the same old nasty people at Timblair.net who as mentioned before, turned up on Media Watch this year. That's how abusive his intended recruits are.
"Poor bruce (sic) does seem to want to have two bob each way and it is intresting (sic) that on his blogs he has half a dozen links to sites about philosphy (sic) and aethiesm (sic) almost as if he is trying to prove his crdentials (sic) as an aethiest (sic).....when really he presents so many arguments for the green religion...." - Iain Hall, 6th of March 2006.
"Saddy (sic) SD Dave you are right I wonder what sort of drugs that man is using because his posts are just so confused/willfully obscure .
You may notice another he has post with a picture of himself as a cartoon superhero , so full of hubris , with so little to be hubristic (sic) about. Defintely (sic) of the school of thought that believe all you have to do is asert (sic) something loudly and often and then miraculiously (sic) it is proven...Ho HUM" - Iain Hall, 7th of March 2006.
Editor's Note: This last line of defamation by Iain Hall contains a categorically false statement. Bruce Everett did not post a hero picture of himself, he posted a villain picture of himself based on Iain wrongly "outing" him as super-villain "Bruce Stinson". A blunder that was laughed about here and here. From reading you can see that Iain is knowingly lying.
Initially, Everett refrained from banning Iain on his blog, saying that he wasn't concerned too much about Iain's above slanders when it was brought to his attention by "Janine Aussie". Then when Everett later became aware of the severity Iain's campaign against "Anonymous Lefty" Jeremy Sear, he banned Iain.
This brought about the following on Iain's then "Building Eight of Nine" blog after Everett objected to further slanderous remarks and deceptions...
"Anyone looking at the comments here or at "Boltwatch watch" could not fail to notice that Bruce Everett is having a big "dummy spit" about the posts here and there about the fact that I write about him ,his prose , and the fact that he has decided to ban me from commenting at his blog . Poor Bruce seems to believe that he is being persecuted by me . It strikes me as rather funny that when Bruce writes a post at his blog for which I am a central feature, and to which he offered me no right of reply and then he wonders why I should write about the matter here." - Iain Hall, Building Eight of Nine, May 2006.
Editor's Note: Somehow, I don't think it's the fact that Iain is writing about him that bothers Everett, but rather the deceptive and defamatory way that Iain does it.
- Deepthroat
